Catacomb Resident Blog

Shoveling Manure 04

28 October 2023

Aleister Crowley struggled hard to find his "true will", giving the appearance of being unsure if he had ever done so. He kept searching in all directions, except the right one. Our Savior grants a clear view of convictions freely to His followers, and full assurance of faith.

One of the things Crowley tried was Freemasonry. Masons admit to it because they believe it's in their favor. However, Freemasons have lied about others they would like to claim. The real issue with Freemasonry is political, not Satanism or anything else. Their claims to esoteric knowledge are powerless.

There are thousands of versions of their story, but don't trust Freemasons to be honest about the nature of their organization and what they've done in the past. Don't take their word for anything. The issue I want to pick on here is the wild nonsense about their worshiping Baphomet. That was a hoax perpetrated by Leo Taxil. He was trying to prank the Catholic Church about some things, and at one point made up some bizarre stories about the Palladium Rite, included images of Baphomet, and implicated Albert Pike. Pike had nothing to do with it (nor did he write the prophecy about three world wars).

Taxil later admitted that none of it was true. It turned out that Baphomet was just a weird symbol made up by some people who were trying to distance themselves from the Church. It's all anti-church symbolism, and it was never intended to symbolize any actual deity. It doesn't take much research to find this out. The self-professing Satanists who use it as their religious symbol are either too stupid to take seriously, or they are pranking like Leo Taxil. Chances are they will lie about it. Almost the whole gamut of what is labeled "Satanism" is bogus, as I've pointed out before.

That applies to the big "Satanic Panic" that loomed large in Big Eva circles in the 1980s and 1990s. It came out of California, with wild tales of satanic cults engaging in ritual child sexual abuse and murder. There were children reported missing in the same hoax. It was nothing more than a whole collection of wild stories sold by a small group of people trying to make a buck. It climaxed with a large van filled with exhibits and lurid stories going around to churches in California (and pulling in huge "love offerings"). This stuff even made it into police training; the Military law enforcement agencies had a few bulletins about it during the same time.

It's not that nothing happened, but that it was not on the scale reported. It was supposed to be happening in just about every community across the US. But the lore kept growing until it was clearly some kind of bad joke. It didn't justify all the piles of official notices warning police to look for various symbols of this cult ritual and key evidence of their presence. The real deal was quite rare and not at all organized, nor interconnected, but often just a silly cover for more mundane fleshly lusts.

It became the lore behind the current theory that all the ruling elite subscribe to the same small lore of "satanism" ritual abuse of children. To the degree there is such a thing -- and there is -- it's a tiny few programs, all carefully protected by the US government. We know about some of them: The Franklin Scandal, the Dutroux Affair (in Belgium), The Finders, Epstein, a handful of church related sex rings, etc. Police are unlikely to find evidence of it these days. The few times they found it in recent history, the whole thing was taken out of their hands; The Finders case involved the CIA. The adult escorts were ordered released, and the poor kids they were transporting went back into their custody. The real deal is out there; it's quite uncommon.

Most pedophile rings are used as political leverage. Running one simply costs too much for it to be more common. In almost every case where satanism is alleged, it turned out to be phony. Genuine ritual abuse is there, and it's quite rare. Take the time to study them if you are interested. Hint: There is a sliver of truth behind Pizzagate, but it's buried in nonsense. The hysteria is the real problem.

The real dangers are masked by hoaxes. It's not just pedophile rings, but all the other various threats to Covenant folks. The Freemasons remain only a mild threat because of the secrecy of their political influence (mostly small time), but it's not the problem it once was during my lifetime. They still cause some minor trouble in the military, but nothing like it had been when commanders who were Masons looked for ways to avoid discipline against fellow members under their command. The Freemasons officially discourage that kind of favoritism. These days, the ruling elite still join the Masons to get their ticket punched; it's just one of several ways they build connections.

My understanding is that, at some point, a new generation of Freemason leaders came on the scene and wanted to break away from their dirty past. Are you curious about the secret handshakes? There are several, depending on the level of advancement. Passwords? Same story; depends on your rank. You can find them on the Net. Almost all their secrets are out there, somewhere online. You can find pictures of the funny pants with one leg cut short, the overly wrought oaths, the esoteric language, etc.

Meanwhile, whatever Satanism actually is has much more to do with bucking the influence of the churches than actual devil worship. The participants do their best to give offense, and this is the whole point in choosing the name "Satan". It's just anti-churchism, and it's often simply a mask for secular humanism. There is no single definition of Satanism that fits everyone who claims the label. The whole thing is wrapped up in what it is not, instead of what it is.

Most of this stuff isn't a threat for Covenant people. The various modern day crusades from church leaders against this or that alleged "Satanism" serve more to cover the real problems than to point out genuine threats. The people involved in these dark things don't even know who we are, in terms of what makes Radix Fidem different from the mainstream. The mainstream church is a far bigger threat to covenant faith. Any future persecution actually targeting our faith will come from the churches.


This document is public domain; spread the message.